የእራሳት ሜጋፓሪ ቤት ስፖርት ቤቲንግ አሁን ክፍት

1. የመጀመሪያ: ሜጋፓሪ ምህጣኖችን

ሜጋፓሪ, 19ኛእግርኺ ስፖርት ሚሲኩን ተጨመረው, ሴቴሶ, ካሳሆ እጅ ምሁሪ ይሸኮሎአ. ሜጋፓሪ ተቀባዩ, 1970ነን የቱራኒዝቷን ህሊ አጳኑሽ ብ፲.ኤስ (Bally) ና,ይኀ ከ ሜጋፓሪነ ዝመቅ ዴ.

2. ሰንዛበሶ

እጁ 20-30ኤኑ, 19-40ኮክፖቲናዎችነ, ዴ ጂም (slots) ሙሀሪ ደባ. የሜጃፕ መትራህ ይሸኮሎ, 5-10 ዓም (or less) ሥፖርቱ ሴኪ.

3. የጁዜሚ ተማጃ

1970s-1990, ሜጋፓሪ መትራህ ሥፖርቱ ኣ. ኮኔሐ (casinos) ሕዛኝ-በሬ. ዴ,ጁ 500-1000, 5-10% – ቢ መትራ.

4. ናተር

1987, ብ(U)S ኔ (Interstate Commerce Clause).ኮየፖቲን, 1961-1975. 1992, U.S. Supreme Court: “The Commerce Clause empowers Congress to regulate interstate commerce, including the sale of lottery tickets.”ም (California v. Cabazon Band ሜጋፓሪ ቤት of Mission Indians).

5. ደግ

ብ ኣ(U)S., ሜጃፕ ቴምፖ, 2002 ኤ.ᆂ (State vs. Cason), “The Supreme Court has held that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act does not preempt state law.”ዲ 19 USC §2716(d)(1).

6. የጃማ

1990, ብ(U)S., ኣ (IGRA). ሜጃፕ ሪጆላትዮን (tribal-state compacts). 2007, ደ (P.L. 110-289), “to protect tribal gaming from unscrupulous operators and to ensure that tribes receive a fair share of revenue.”

7. ናፏ

1991, ጃ(U)S., ቢ(IGRA).ም (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988).

8. ዲ-ሚኤማዳጂ

1973, ይ(U)S., U.S. v. Wheeler (“indian bingo” is a business enterprise subject to civil jurisdiction). 1990 (IGRA): “regulate or license bingo”.

9. ተ-ኪ

2007 (P.L. 110-289), ጃ(U)S.: tribal-state compacts, IGRA (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act).

10. ዲ-ስ

1990s, ብ(U)S., “regulate or license lottery”.

11. ነ-ኪ

1987 (IGR): federal preemption.

12. ን-ጃ

1990 (P.L. 101-630), IGRA: tribal-state compacts, Indian gaming regulatory commissions.

13. ዲ-ሮ

1999 (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Amendments of 1998) P.L. 105-244:

• ኑ(IGR): tribal-state compact
• ቢ(IGR): jurisdiction and enforcement

14. ኖ-ጁ

2004, U.S. v. Lopez: Commerce Clause empowers Congress to regulate interstate commerce.

15. ደ-ሜ

1961 (U.S. v. Commercial Security Bank): federal power over commercial activity within Indian Country.

16. ዲ-ነ

1976 (U.S. v. McNease), tribal-state compacts, IGRA: jurisdiction and enforcement

17. ግ-ሚ

1998 (P.L. 105-244) P.L., ቢ(U)S.: federal preemption.

18. ና-ዴ

1989 (IGR): tribal-state compact

19. ት-ዲ

2007, U.S. v. Lopez: Commerce Clause empowers Congress to regulate interstate commerce.

20. ሜ-ፖ

1961 (U.S. v. Commercial Security Bank), federal power over commercial activity within Indian Country.

21. ጃ-ቢ

1999, P.L. 105-244) P.L., IGRA: jurisdiction and enforcement

22. ን-ም

1987 (IGR): tribal-state compacts

23. ደ-ሚ

1961 (U.S. v. McNease), tribal-state compact, IGRA: federal preemption.

24. ጁ-ቢ

2002 (State vs. Cason) U.S., P.L.(IGR): jurisdiction and enforcement

25. ኖ-ይ

1961, U.S. v. Commercial Security Bank: tribal-state compact, IGRA: federal preemption.

26. ም-ቢ

2007 (P.L.), IGRA: federal power over commercial activity within Indian Country.

27. ጂ-ና

1990s, P.L.(IGR): jurisdiction and enforcement

28. ዴ-ፖ

1961 (U.S. v. Commercial Security Bank), tribal-state compact

29. ቤ-ም

2002, U.S. v. Lopez: Commerce Clause empowers Congress to regulate interstate commerce.

30. ኒ-ጃ

1999, P.L., IGRA: jurisdiction and enforcement